Size Matters: The Long and Short of Trip Length
Most people overpack their suitcase. I overpack the trip itself.
I’m not sure how it happens, but I think Google earth might be partly to blame. Google earth and prepositional phrases. While mapping out a trip, I start to zoom out. I think hey–look at that–Utah is right above Arizona. And if I’ll already be in Arizona…but wait–Colorado is right next to Utah. I mean how big can these states really be?
And then I start pricing rental cars and intermediate flights and creating calendar-esque schedules. Trust me, it gets out of hand quickly. I spent a good part of last week planning my second-to-next trip (which, incidentally, is not to Arizona or Utah or Colorado), and right now it is hovering right around the 18 day mark. I know, I know, I have a ten-day travel rule–but there’s really no way to make this particular trip any shorter.
Ok that’s a lie. I don’t want to make this particular trip any shorter. It will likely be my last big (solo) trip of my year away from work, and I want to make it count.
But I know that longer trips have as many cons as pros, and shorter trips have as many pros as cons. In fact, my actual next trip–a long weekend in DC beginning next Wednesday–is a really short trip in my world. Yet I’ve had as much fun on a day trip as I have on a month-long adventure. So really–which is better? Many short trips or one long trip?
Short Trip Pros
-Short trips are cheaper overall. You’ll be gone fewer nights, you’ll eat fewer meals, you’ll visit fewer sights. All of this means fewer dollars spent.
-Short trips are easier to plan. I can plan a weekend trip to any major city or tourist town in about an hour. Yes, even if I haven’t ever been there.
-Short trips require little to no packing. I’ve gone away for the weekend with no more than my phone charger and a spare dress tucked in my purse.
-Short trips are perfect for my OCD approach to planning. If you only have two days to visit a city, town, or attraction, a packed trip itinerary may be your best bet. And even if it is a busy two days–hell, it’s only two days!
Short Trip Cons
-The per-day cost of a short trip is often higher, especially if transportation costs are high.
-It is very unlikely you’ll get to see and do all that you want during the course of a short trip. I visited Amsterdam for 36 hours. I saw the VanGogh Museum but I missed the red light district. Was this a good trade off? Probably. But still.
-It is also very unlikely that you’ll get outside of the touristy areas or, in the case of a city-break, the surrounding countryside.
Long Trip Pros
-Your per-day cost is less. This is where I really get myself into trouble. I get in the ‘well if I’m going to pay to fly here I might as well also…’ mindset. Additionally, using apartment rental sites (such as Home Away or VRBO) often results in huge savings in comparison to a hotel or even motel.
-If you are moving around a lot, a longer trip allows you to stay in one place longer as well as to see the places in between. Sure, I could have driven to Nova Scotia over the course of two days, stopping once to sleep. But instead, I made it take a week and a half, and stopped for one or two nights at various places along the way.
-A longer trip can be a more laid-back trip. During our two weeks in Paris, I spent one whole day just sleeping in, shopping, and cooking dinner.
-The weather is more likely to cooperate at some point during a longer trip. I was in Jamaica for eight hours last month. And it was pouring and windy the whole time. Had I been there for, say, a week, I surely would have had at least one sunny day to enjoy.
Long Trip Cons
-They typically cost more overall. Please note my use of the word typically. I know that this isn’t always true, as I’ve read all about people who travel around the world for a year on very little. And I’ve gone away by myself for a week or more for less than I’ve spent on a long weekend in New York with my husband. But that’s because my husband really likes fancy restaurants and expensive beer. But still–spending fewer nights away is typically less expensive.
-It is harder to schedule long trips. Holidays get in the way, as do family obligations and that pesky little thing called work.
-Planning a longer trip is often overwhelming.
-Your house and garden will suffer. We returned from our road trip last summer to find that our squash had squished our tomatoes, cages and all. It had also grown pretty far into several of our neighbors’ yards. So I guess I should add to this ‘longer trips will piss off your neighbors’.
-If you are traveling solo–as I frequently do–longer trips can get lonely. And husband can get sick of eating pizza while you’re gone, too. Oh–and your dog will probably miss you (and develop a strange anxiety about backpacks. My dogs cry hysterically if they see me carry my backpack out to the garage.)
As I plan my second-to-next trip–and think about how on earth I’m going to shorten it–I do take all of these things into consideration. But still–how much do you want to bet that it will remain an almost-three-week trip?
What do you think? Do you prefer multiple short trips or one big long trip? Why? Share your personal pros and cons in the comments below.
I’ll bet you add/subtract at least 3 places before you finalize that trip!!! And come up with at least 14 things you WISH you could do but might not be able to fit in. LOL!!! I love reading about your planning. It makes my day dreaming (and trip remembring) more justifiable. I’ve been looking at airfares to London and Dublin and wishing I could convince my mom to go to Europe. She would love it – but I know it won’t happen. Ah well… I still can dream, and read your posts…..
by the way, Vegas was great- Rod Stewart still rocks!!!
I’m glad you had a good time in Vegas–but sorry to hear that you’re exhausted. Of course, I’d rather be exhausted after a short trip than have to stay home!
I was looking at flights to London today, too. Too expensive. Boo. Last year they were having fare sales for less than $400/rt from NYC. This year it is more than double that. Ah well–guess I’ll be staying on this side of the Atlantic!
Oh- and I’d add- on short trips you usually don’t get to relax much- I come more tired after our one nighters to concerts than before we left (usually). And on longer ones you can just let go of ‘real life’ a bit more (again, usuallly).
Yes–the letting go of real life part might be the very best part! Can’t believe I failed to add that to my list!
I finally have my husband in agreement that one week for a trip is not enough, especially if you are going to several locations. We just spent two weeks traveling all over Arizona and it was just about perfect.
A “long” trip for us is usually anything from 5-7 days. Unfortunately we can’t really take trips that are any longer, given both work commitments and they costs! We have a road trip to Tennessee planned soon and there is so much I want to do along the way. I could easily make that trip 2 weeks long if we had the vacation days. I totally agree with you – my logic is “when is the next time we’ll be able to drive down there? Fit in everything while we can!” Ah well, at least a week long trip is better than nothing!
I absolutely agree–a week-long trip is definitely better than no trip at all!
Isn’t the ‘along the way’ thing so maddening? It took us a month to travel 1,200 miles. We want to do a cross-country trip but that would take half a year! And we’ll never have that!
Though I’ve got to be honest–when traveling solo, longer trips can get lonely. I’m looking to revamp my three week trip into three one week trips. I’ll let you all know how that turns out! Ha!
Ah- your mention of cross-country trips triggered a memory from childhood. When I was 16, my dad and one of his brothers decided to take their families on a cross-country trip. There were 13 of us in 2 Dodge campers. (My dad and mom, me, 2 sister, and an aunt that was only 4 years older than me, in other camper- Grandmother, aunt, uncle, their 2 boys and a couple of other cousins). We started in Atlanta in June and didn’t return until late July. We went thorugh Memphis, then over to New Mexico, through Oaklahoma, Death Valley, Grand Canyon, Petrified Forrest, Painted Desert, San Francisco, up Calf. coast, redwood forrest, Crater Lake, Yellowstone Natl Park, St. Louis, Jackson Hole, Las Vegas Utah, Salt Flats, etc. We now refer to it as the trip from hell. We were in a tornado in Oklahoma, the engine in our camper kept catching on fire in Death Valley, and the breaks went out as we came down the moutain out of Yellowstone (after full dark) on July 4th (Daddy didn’t ‘think’ we’d need reservations to camp there ), then in St. Louis the starter broke and we couldn’t turn off the engine again!!! It was a real adventure!!! It’s one reason I don’t camp now- I prefer to RELAX on vacation- not WORK or WORRY!!!!!
I don’t particularly care for short trips, because the places I want to visit are all an airplane ride away and it’s just not worth the expense for a short trip. But I don’t like to travel for too long at a time either. 1-2 weeks is my max, at which point I’m missing my own bed, shower and kitchen and just want to be home again. Still, I hear you on the “well if I’m going to spend the money to go all the way here, maybe I should tack on….” syndrome. It can be hard to resist. I often have to rein myself in because I know I have a tendency to overdo activities on my trips and come home more exhausted than when I left. And that kind of defeats the purpose of vacation travel. 🙂
You are talking to the queen of overdoing it! Today I…went to the National Zoo, walked around Georgetown (the university and the town), visited the botanical gardens, the Folger Shakespeare Library, the Library of Congress AND had a three-hour dinner at an restaurant featuring menus from the national archives American food history exhibit. It’s 10:48 and I’m so tired!
But I also hear you on the ‘flight away’ thing. If I’m going to spend x amount of money–and many hours–getting somewhere, I want to make the most of it. I wish I could do short trips to far away places, but I think that would be exhausting too.
Ahh the problems we have! Ha!